Masteries · Jason GlowneyArithmoí Book 1

Masteries

1.2.7 Tangent Spaces

Lie matrix groups are smooth man­i­folds that tend to be curved ob­jects, but it turns out that the char­ac­ter­is­tic math­e­mat­ics of a matrix group can be en­cap­su­lat­ed in the flat space, that is, the tan­gent space 𝔗ϵ(G)\mathfrak{T}_{\epsilon}(G) The tan­gent space of a group GG con­sists of smooth paths A(t)A(t) moving through the iden­ti­ty ϵ\epsilon. Smooth de­fines that de­riv­a­tives of these paths exist (A′(t))\left( A^{'}(t) \right) and if A(0)=ϵA(0) = \epsilon, then A′(0)A^{'}(0) is called the tan­gent vector of A(t)A(t) at ϵ\epsilon.1 De­ter­min­ing the matrix de­riv­a­tive of AA cen­tered at the iden­ti­ty A′(0)A^{'}(0) to eval­u­ate the smooth paths through is straight­for­ward for the gen­er­al and spe­cial linear groups GL(n,ℂ)GL\left( n,\mathbb{C} \right) and SL(n,ℂ).SL\left( n,\mathbb{C} \right).The tan­gent vec­tors of these groups will take the form of a n×nn \times n skew-sym­met­ric matrix X,X,de­fined for X∈ℂX\in \mathbb{C}, as

X+X∗=0.\begin{array}{r} X + X^{*} = 0. \end{array}
(1.2.141)

For XX, a square Lie al­ge­bra matrix, the ex­po­nen­tial map­ping eXe^{X} yields a smooth path via dif­fer­en­tia­bil­i­ty, with a tan­gent vector at the iden­ti­ty. For the group G,G,we set a smooth path A(t)A(t) to rep­re­sent

A(t)=etX,\begin{array}{r} A(t) = e^{tX}, \end{array}
(1.2.142)

and by being smooth, there exists a de­riv­a­tive of A(t)A(t) that has the fol­low­ing form

A′(t)=XetX.\begin{array}{r} A^{'}(t) = Xe^{tX}\text{.} \end{array}
(1.2.143)

Eval­u­at­ing the paths through the iden­ti­ty means con­sid­er­ing A′(t)A^{'}(t) when t=0t = 0 , which yields the tan­gent vec­tors that com­prise the Lie al­ge­bra XX

A′(0)=Xe0=X.\begin{array}{r} A^{'}(0) = Xe^{0} = X. \end{array}
(1.2.144)

For the sake of clar­i­ty, the op­er­a­tor no­ta­tion in the fol­low­ing the­o­rem acting on XX, is the fol­low­ing: the trans­pose is de­not­ed as XTX^{T}, the con­ju­gate as X\overline{X}, and the con­ju­gate trans­pose is X†X^{\dagger} and is equiv­a­lent to XT.{\overline{X}}^{T}.

The­o­rem (1.2.145) – The tan­gent vec­tors XX at ϵ\epsilon, for the O(n), U(n), Sp(n)O(n),\ U(n),\ Sp(n) groups are ma­tri­ces of the fol­low­ing forms:

  • 𝔗ϵ(O(n))={X∈Gn(ℝ):X+XT=0}\mathfrak{T}_{\epsilon}\left( O(n) \right) = \{ X \in G_{n}\left( \mathbb{R} \right):X + X^{T} = 0\}.
𝔗ϵ(U(n))={X∈Gn(ℂ):X+X†=0}.\mathfrak{T}_{\epsilon}\left( U(n) \right) = \left\{ X \in G_{n}\left( \mathbb{C} \right):X + X^{\dagger} = 0 \right\}.
𝔗ϵ(Sp(n))={X∈Gn(ℍ):X+X†=0}.\mathfrak{T}_{\epsilon}\left( Sp(n) \right) = \left\{ X \in G_{n}\left( \mathbb{H} \right):X + X^{\dagger} = 0 \right\}.

Proof – The ma­tri­ces A∈O(n),A \in O(n), by way of their or­thog­o­nal­i­ty, sat­is­fy AAT=ϵ.AA^{T} = \epsilon. For A=A(t),A = A(t), rep­re­sent­ing a smooth path that orig­i­nates at the iden­ti­ty ϵ\epsilon, we eval­u­ate the de­riv­a­tive of

ddt(A(t)A(t)T=ϵ).\begin{array}{r} \frac{d}{dt}\left( A(t){A(t)}^{T} = \epsilon \right). \end{array}

The prod­uct rule holds for this de­riv­a­tive ex­pres­sion, given the iden­ti­ty, ϵ\epsilon, is a con­stant, and the de­riv­a­tive of a con­stant is zero, ddt(ϵ)=0\frac{d}{dt}(\epsilon) = 0. Solv­ing by the prod­uct rule yields

A′(t)A(t)T+A(t)A′(t)T=0,\begin{array}{r} A^{'}(t)A(t)^{T} + A(t)A^{'}(t)^{T} = 0, \end{array}

and as both A(0), A(0)T=ϵA(0),\ A(0)^{T} = \epsilon, for t=0t = 0 the above be­comes

A′(0)+A′(0)T=0.\begin{array}{r} A^{'}(0) + A^{'}(0)^{T} = 0. \end{array}

There­fore, any tan­gent vector X=A′(0)X = A^{'}(0) will sat­is­fy the skew-sym­me­try con­di­tion X+XT=0.X + X^{T} = 0.

The ma­tri­ces A∈U(n)A \in U(n), by way of their uni­tary con­di­tions, sat­is­fy AA†=ϵ.AA^{\dagger} = \epsilon. For A=A(t)A = A(t), a smooth path that orig­i­nates at the iden­ti­ty ϵ\epsilon, we eval­u­ate the de­riv­a­tive of

ddt(A(t)A†(t)=ϵ).\begin{array}{r} \frac{d}{dt}\left( A(t)A^{\dagger}(t) = \epsilon \right). \end{array}

The prod­uct rule holds for this de­riv­a­tive ex­pres­sion, given the iden­ti­ty, ϵ\epsilon, is a con­stant, and the de­riv­a­tive of a con­stant is zero, ddt(ϵ)=0\frac{d}{dt}(\epsilon) = 0. Solv­ing by the prod­uct rule yields

A′(t)A†(t)+A(t)(A†(t))′=0,\begin{array}{r} A^{'}(t)A^{\dagger}(t) + A(t)\left( A^{\dagger}(t) \right)^{'} = 0, \end{array}

and as both A(0),A†(0)=ϵA(0),A^{\dagger}(0) = \epsilon, for t=0t = 0, the above be­comes

A′(0)+(A†(0))′=0.\begin{array}{r} A^{'}(0) + \left( A^{\dagger}(0) \right)^{'} = 0. \end{array}

There­fore, any tan­gent vector, X=A′(0)X = A^{'}(0), will sat­is­fy the skew-sym­me­try con­di­tion, X+X†=0.X + X^{\dagger} = 0. The ma­tri­ces A∈Sp(n)A \in Sp(n), by way of their quater­nion con­di­tions, sat­is­fy AA†=ϵ.AA^{\dagger} = \epsilon. For A=A(t)A = A(t), a smooth path that orig­i­nates at the iden­ti­ty, ϵ\epsilon, we eval­u­ate the de­riv­a­tive of

ddt(A(t)A†(t)=ϵ).\begin{array}{r} \frac{d}{dt}\left( A(t)A^{\dagger}(t) = \epsilon \right). \end{array}

The prod­uct rule holds for this de­riv­a­tive ex­pres­sion, given the iden­ti­ty, ϵ\epsilon, is a con­stant, and the de­riv­a­tive of a con­stant is zero, ddt(ϵ)=0\frac{d}{dt}(\epsilon) = 0. Solv­ing by the prod­uct rule yields

A′(t)A†(t)+A(t)(A†(t))′=0,\begin{array}{r} A^{'}(t)A^{\dagger}(t) + A(t)\left( A^{\dagger}(t) \right)^{'} = 0, \end{array}

and as both A(0),A†(0)=ϵA(0),A^{\dagger}(0) = \epsilon, for t=0t = 0, the above be­comes

A′(0)+(A†(0))′=0.\begin{array}{r} A^{'}(0) + \left( A^{\dagger}(0) \right)^{'} = 0. \end{array}

There­fore, any tan­gent vector X=A′(0)X = A^{'}(0), will sat­is­fy the skew-sym­me­try con­di­tion X+X†=0.X + X^{\dagger} = 0.

□\square

For the skew-sym­me­try con­di­tion X+XT=0X + X^{T} = 0, the el­e­ments along the di­ag­o­nals of XX will be 0, and the trans­pose of each el­e­ment in XX sat­is­fies xj,k=x_{j,k} =-xj,kx_{j,k}. For the X+X†=0X + X^{\dagger} = 0 cases of the U(n),Sp(n)U(n),Sp(n) groups, the ma­tri­ces are called skew-Her­mit­ian, where the matrix en­tries in XX sat­is­fy xj,k=x_{j,k} =-xj,k{\overline{x}}_{j,k}, and the di­ag­o­nal en­tries of XX are purely imag­i­nary. It should be noted that some tan­gent spaces at the iden­ti­ty can be shared for spe­cif­ic groups and their sub­groups; a case in point is the O(n)O(n) groups and their SO(n)SO(n) sub­groups.

  1. Still­well, John, "Naive Lie Theory", Springer, 2008