The mathematical relationship for curvature in the real-valued Euclidean plane is well established. Still, perhaps one might find it hard to locate a mathematical framework for complex-valued functional curvature in the literature. A complex function denoted , has for its argument for . To properly consider complex curvature, it is important first to prove for , that
(1.3.190)
We will use the Cauchy-Riemann equations to help prove this, which represent a set of two partial differential equations. Taken together, the Cauchy-Riemann equations ensure that a complex function is holomorphic, meaning it is differentiable in the domain of complex space. For a complex function , and , the Cauchy-Riemann equations are the following
(1.3.191)
(1.3.192)
For the function , represents the real part, and represents the imaginary part, and the Cauchy-Riemann equations take the complex form
(1.3.193)
Each derivative is defined as a limit in the form
(1.3.194)
and assuming the limit for exists, the Cauchy-Riemann equations detail if the result appears along the real or imaginary-axis. To apply the equations using an example, we define a function , as
(1.3.195)
and calculate its differential functions
(1.3.196)
(1.3.197)
finding the Cauchy-Riemann conditions are met, given that
(1.3.198)
With this background pertaining the equations, we can now prove that .
Theorem (1.3.199) – The function , for , is a holomorphic function, and as such, is complex-differentiable in its whole domain , with a differential,
Proof – We use the Cauchy-Riemann equations to prove is complex-differentiable at all points in its domain , and further, is continuously differentiable. Writing , as
and by using the complex form of the Cauchy-Riemann equations
we find the partial derivatives
Plugging these into the Cauchy-Riemann form, we find they are satisfied
Since is the composition of continuous trigonometric functions, for , we have a complex function that is infinitely differentiable at every point for all values of the open subset of. To determine the existence and value of the complex derivative , we define it as the limit
which can be taken along either the imaginary or real-axis
Using the limit along the imaginary-axis, we apply l'Hôpital's rule to
Since is an exponential function and continuous, we set , to arrive at our complex derivative
To consider complex curvature, we start with the example of a complex function , for , whose tangent vector is calculated, as
(1.3.200)
Thus, from the above, we can see that the argument of the tangent vector is the imaginary portion of the argument
(1.3.201)
When considering the curvature of a complex function, we are looking to find the rate of rotation of the tangent vector concerning the distance along the curve. To find the arc, we would take the imaginary portion of the derivative for the argument . Let
(1.3.202)
and the rate of change for , would be
(1.3.203)
As the tangent vector moves with unit speed, the product of the tangent unit vector and , gives us the vertical arc through a point that is one-unit length from the center of curvature, resulting in
(1.3.204)
As travels the complex curve with unit speed, also travels the image with a speed . This absolute value will yield the real-valued portion of the complex function and should be considered as the inverse radius of the function. Dividing Eq. 1.3.204 by , we arrive at the following equation of curvature
(1.3.205)
Needham1 goes further, defining the complex curvature of , as
(1.3.206)
where denotes the complex conjugate of , and this expression illuminates that the tangent vector is not intrinsic to the complex function , and retains the element of direction from the original curve. Needham argues that complex curvature is a very natural mathematical quantity when thought of as a point , from which vectors emanate and project onto a line. The projection of onto a line through is the curvature of the image of that line at Now, can be related to by taking the imaginary portion of , for , as the scalar product in
(1.3.207)
With a precise mathematical definition for complex curvature, we now take the example , for . As previously proven, we know that if then , and calculating first, shows that
(1.3.208)
Since , we know that , and above, becomes
(1.3.209)
Evaluating the complex curvature of , we would find
(1.3.210)
and it is easy to show that
(1.3.211)
The preferred approach to contemplating complex curvature starts by taking the complex function in its polar form
(1.3.212)
Where intuitively, it is apparent that the segment length relates to the radial component which is then rotated by , in relation to the real-axis of the complex plane. Since curvature is defined as the rate of change for a curve, compared to the change in the distance at a point on that curve, the signed curvature of is
(1.3.213)
which simplifies to
(1.3.214)
In the next section, we apply curvature to functions in the complex plane by using examples from the asymptotic number functions related to the group in Chapter 1.