Masteries · Jason GlowneyArithmoí Book 1

Masteries

1.3.7 Complex Curvature

The math­e­mat­i­cal re­la­tion­ship for cur­va­ture in the real-valued Eu­clid­ean plane is well es­tab­lished. Still, per­haps one might find it hard to locate a math­e­mat­i­cal frame­work for com­plex-valued func­tion­al cur­va­ture in the lit­er­a­ture. A com­plex func­tion de­not­ed f(z)f(z), has for its ar­gu­ment z=x+iy,z = x + iy,for x,y∈ℝx,y\in \mathbb{R}. To prop­er­ly con­sid­er com­plex cur­va­ture, it is im­por­tant first to prove for z=(x+iy)z = (x + iy), that

ddzez=ez.\begin{array}{r} \frac{d}{dz}e^{z} = e^{z}. \end{array}
(1.3.190)

We will use the Cauchy-Rie­mann equa­tions to help prove this, which rep­re­sent a set of two par­tial dif­fer­en­tial equa­tions. Taken to­geth­er, the Cauchy-Rie­mann equa­tions ensure that a com­plex func­tion is holo­mor­phic, mean­ing it is dif­fer­en­tiable in the domain of com­plex space. For a com­plex func­tion f(z)=u(z)+iv(z)f(z) = u(z) + iv(z), and z=x+iyz = x + iy, the Cauchy-Rie­mann equa­tions are the fol­low­ing

dudx=dvdy,\begin{array}{r} \frac{du}{dx} = \frac{dv}{dy}, \end{array}
(1.3.191)
dudy=−dvdx.\begin{array}{r} \frac{du}{dy} = - \frac{dv}{dx}. \end{array}
(1.3.192)

For the func­tion f(z)f(z), uu rep­re­sents the real part, and vv rep­re­sents the imag­i­nary part, and the Cauchy-Rie­mann equa­tions take the com­plex form

idfdx=dfdy.\begin{array}{r} i\frac{df}{dx} = \frac{df}{dy}. \end{array}
(1.3.193)

Each de­riv­a­tive is de­fined as a limit in the form

lim(h→0h∈ℂ)⁡f(z0+h)−f(z0)h=f′(z0),\begin{array}{r} \lim_{\binom{h \rightarrow 0}{h \in \mathbb{C}}}\frac{f\left( z_{0} + h \right) - f\left( z_{0} \right)}{h} = f^{'}\left( z_{0} \right), \end{array}
(1.3.194)

and as­sum­ing the limit for h→0h \rightarrow 0 exists, the Cauchy-Rie­mann equa­tions detail if the result ap­pears along the real or imag­i­nary-axis. To apply the equa­tions using an ex­am­ple, we define a func­tion f(z)f(z), as

f(z)=(x+iy)3=x3+3ix2y−3xy2−iy3,\begin{array}{r} f(z) = (x + iy)^{3} = x^{3} + 3ix^{2}y - 3xy^{2} - iy^{3}, \end{array}
(1.3.195)

and cal­cu­late its dif­fer­en­tial func­tions

idfdx=i(3x2+6ixy−3y2),\begin{array}{r} i\frac{df}{dx} = i\left( 3x^{2} + 6ixy - 3y^{2} \right), \end{array}
(1.3.196)
dfdy=3ix2−6xy−3iy2,\begin{array}{r} \frac{df}{dy} = 3ix^{2} - 6xy - 3iy^{2}, \end{array}
(1.3.197)

find­ing the Cauchy-Rie­mann con­di­tions are met, given that

3ix2−6xy−3iy2=3ix2−6xy−3iy2.\begin{array}{r} 3ix^{2} - 6xy - 3iy^{2} = 3ix^{2} - 6xy - 3iy^{2}. \end{array}
(1.3.198)

With this back­ground per­tain­ing the equa­tions, we can now prove that ddz(ez)=ez\frac{d}{dz}\left( e^{z} \right) = e^{z}.

The­o­rem (1.3.199) – The func­tion f(z)=ezf(z) = e^{z}, for z=(x+iy),z = (x + iy), {x,y}∈ℝ\left\{ x,y \right\}\in \mathbb{R}, is a holo­mor­phic func­tion, and as such, is com­plex-dif­fer­en­tiable in its whole domain ∈ℂ\in \mathbb{C}, with a dif­fer­en­tial, ddz(ez)=ez.\frac{d}{dz}\left( e^{z} \right) = e^{z}.

Proof – We use the Cauchy-Rie­mann equa­tions to prove f(z)=ezf(z) = e^{z} is com­plex-dif­fer­en­tiable at all points in its domain ∈ℂ\in \mathbb{C}, and fur­ther, is con­tin­u­ous­ly dif­fer­en­tiable. Writ­ing eze^{z}, as

ez=exeiy,\begin{array}{r} e^{z} = e^{x}e^{iy}, \end{array}

and by using the com­plex form of the Cauchy-Rie­mann equa­tions

idfdx=dfdy,\begin{array}{r} i\frac{df}{dx} = \frac{df}{dy}, \end{array}

we find the par­tial de­riv­a­tives

dfdxexeiy=exeiy,  dfdyexeiy=iexeiy.\begin{array}{r} \frac{df}{dx}e^{x}e^{iy} = e^{x}e^{iy},\ \ \frac{df}{dy}e^{x}e^{iy} = ie^{x}e^{iy}. \end{array}

Plug­ging these into the Cauchy-Rie­mann form, we find they are sat­is­fied

iexeiy=iexeiy.\begin{array}{r} ie^{x}e^{iy} = ie^{x}e^{iy}. \end{array}

Since exeiye^{x}e^{iy} is the com­po­si­tion of con­tin­u­ous trigono­met­ric func­tions, for exeiy=(cosh⁡(x)+sinh⁡(x))(cos⁡(y)+isin(y))e^{x}e^{iy} = \left( \cosh(x) + \sinh(x) \right)\left( \cos(y) + isin(y) \right), we have a com­plex func­tion that is in­fi­nite­ly dif­fer­en­tiable at every point for all values z=(x+iy)z = (x + iy) of the open subset of. To de­ter­mine the ex­is­tence and value of the com­plex de­riv­a­tive f(z)=ezf(z) = e^{z}, we define it as the limit

lim(h→0h∈ℂ)⁡f(z0+h)−f(z0)h=f′(z0),\begin{array}{r} \lim_{\binom{h \rightarrow 0}{h \in \mathbb{C}}}\frac{f\left( z_{0} + h \right) - f\left( z_{0} \right)}{h} = f^{'}\left( z_{0} \right), \end{array}

which can be taken along either the imag­i­nary or real-axis

lim(h→0h∈ℝ)⁡f(z0+h)−f(z0)h=∂f∂x(z0),\begin{array}{r} \lim_{\binom{h \rightarrow 0}{h \in \mathbb{R}}}\frac{f\left( z_{0} + h \right) - f\left( z_{0} \right)}{h} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\left( z_{0} \right), \end{array}
lim(h→0h∈ℝ)⁡f(z0+ih)−f(z0)ih=∂fi∂y(z0).\begin{array}{r} \lim_{\binom{h \rightarrow 0}{h \in \mathbb{R}}}\frac{f\left( z_{0} + ih \right) - f\left( z_{0} \right)}{ih} = \frac{\partial f}{i\partial y}\left( z_{0} \right). \end{array}

Using the limit along the imag­i­nary-axis, we apply l'Hôpi­tal's rule to ez=ex+iye^{z} = e^{x + iy}

lim(h→0h∈ℝ)⁡e(x+iy+ih)−e(x+iy)ih=lim(h→0h∈ℝ)⁡ddh(e(x+iy+ih)−e(x+iy))ddh(ih)\lim_{\binom{h \rightarrow 0}{h \in \mathbb{R}}}\frac{e^{(x + iy + ih)} - e^{(x + iy)}}{ih} = \lim_{\binom{h \rightarrow 0}{h \in \mathbb{R}}}\frac{\frac{d}{dh}\left( e^{(x + iy + ih)} - e^{(x + iy)} \right)}{\frac{d}{dh}(ih)}
=lim(h→0h∈ℝ)⁡ie(x+iy+ih)i=lim(h→0h∈ℝ)⁡e(x+iy+ih)=exp⁡(lim(h→0h∈ℝ)⁡x+iy+ih).= \lim_{\binom{h \rightarrow 0}{h \in \mathbb{R}}}\frac{{ie}^{(x + iy + ih)}}{i} = \lim_{\binom{h \rightarrow 0}{h \in \mathbb{R}}}e^{(x + iy + ih)} = \exp\left( \lim_{\binom{h \rightarrow 0}{h \in \mathbb{R}}}{x + iy + ih} \right).

Since e(x+iy+ih)e^{(x + iy + ih)} is an ex­po­nen­tial func­tion and con­tin­u­ous, we set h=0h = 0, to arrive at our com­plex de­riv­a­tive

ddzez=e(x+iy)=ez.\begin{array}{r} {\frac{d}{dz}e}^{z} = e^{(x + iy)} = e^{z}. \end{array}
 □\begin{array}{r} \ \square \end{array}

To con­sid­er com­plex cur­va­ture, we start with the ex­am­ple of a com­plex func­tion f(z)=ezf(z) = e^{z}, for z=x+iyz = x + iy, whose tan­gent vector TT is cal­cu­lat­ed, as

T=(f(z))′‖(f(z))′‖=(ez)′‖(ez)′‖=ez‖ez‖=(ez)eRe(z)=(ez)ex=eiy.\begin{array}{r} T = \frac{\left( f(z) \right)^{'}}{\left\| \left( f(z) \right)^{'} \right\|} = \frac{\left( e^{z} \right)^{'}}{\left\| \left( e^{z} \right)^{'} \right\|} = \frac{e^{z}}{\left\| e^{z} \right\|} = \frac{\left( e^{z} \right)}{e^{Re(z)}} = \frac{\left( e^{z} \right)}{e^{x}} = e^{iy}. \end{array}
(1.3.200)

Thus, from the above, we can see that the ar­gu­ment of the tan­gent vector TT is the imag­i­nary por­tion of the ar­gu­ment (ez)′{(e}^{z})'

arg⁡(T)=Im(ln⁡(f′(z)))=y.\begin{array}{r} \arg(T) = Im\left( \ln\left( f'(z) \right) \right) = y. \end{array}
(1.3.201)

When con­sid­er­ing the cur­va­ture of a com­plex func­tion, we are look­ing to find the rate of ro­ta­tion of the tan­gent vector con­cern­ing the dis­tance along the curve. To find the arc, we would take the imag­i­nary por­tion of the de­riv­a­tive for the ar­gu­ment f′(z)f'(z). Let

ϕ=ln⁡(f′(z)),\begin{array}{r} \phi = \ln\left( f'(z) \right), \end{array}
(1.3.202)

and the rate of change for ϕ\phi, would be

ϕ′=(ln⁡(f′(z)))′=(f′′(z)f′(z)).\begin{array}{r} \phi^{'} = \left( \ln\left( f'(z) \right) \right)^{'} = \left( \frac{f^{''}(z)}{f^{'}(z)} \right). \end{array}
(1.3.203)

As the tan­gent vector TT moves with unit speed, the prod­uct of the tan­gent unit vector TT and ϕ′\phi^{'}, gives us the ver­ti­cal arc through a point that is one-unit length from the center of cur­va­ture, re­sult­ing in

Im (Tϕ′)=Im(Tf′′(z)f′(z)).\begin{array}{r} Im\ \left( T\phi^{'} \right) = Im\left( \frac{{Tf}^{''}(z)}{f^{'}(z)} \right). \end{array}
(1.3.204)

As TT trav­els the com­plex curve with unit speed, f(z)f(z) also trav­els the image with a speed |f′(z)|\left| f^{'}(z) \right|. This ab­solute value will yield the real-valued por­tion of the com­plex func­tion and should be con­sid­ered as the in­verse radius of the func­tion. Di­vid­ing Eq. 1.3.204 by |f′(z)|\left| f^{'}(z) \right|, we arrive at the fol­low­ing equa­tion of cur­va­ture (κ)(\kappa)

κ(T)=1|f′(z)|Im(Tf′′(z)f′(z))=1Re(f′(z))Im(Tf′′(z)f′(z)).\begin{array}{r} \kappa(T) = \frac{1}{\left| f^{'}(z) \right|}Im\left( \frac{{Tf}^{''}(z)}{f^{'}(z)} \right) = \frac{1}{{Re(f}^{'}(z))}Im\left( \frac{{Tf}^{''}(z)}{f^{'}(z)} \right). \end{array}
(1.3.205)

Need­ham1 goes fur­ther, defin­ing the com­plex cur­va­ture of f(z)f(z), as

𝒦=i(f′′)∗(f′)∗|f′|,\begin{array}{r} \mathcal{K} =\frac{i\left( f^{''} \right)^{*}}{\left( f^{'} \right)^{*}\left| f^{'} \right|}, \end{array}
(1.3.206)

where (f)∗(f)^{*} de­notes the com­plex con­ju­gate of ff, and this ex­pres­sion il­lu­mi­nates that the tan­gent vector TT is not in­trin­sic to the com­plex func­tion f(z)f(z), and TT re­tains the el­e­ment of di­rec­tion from the orig­i­nal curve. Need­ham argues that com­plex cur­va­ture is a very nat­ur­al math­e­mat­i­cal quan­ti­ty when thought of as a point pp, from which vec­tors em­anate and project onto a line. The pro­jec­tion of 𝒦(p)\mathcal{K}(p) onto a line through pp is the cur­va­ture of the image of that line at f(p).f(p).Now, 𝒦(p)\mathcal{K}(p) can be re­lat­ed to κ(T)\kappa(T) by taking the imag­i­nary por­tion of i𝒦∗Ti\mathcal{K}^{*}T, for 𝒦∙𝐓\mathcal{K} \bullet\mathbf{T}, as the scalar prod­uct in ℝ2\mathbb{R}^{2}

𝒦∙𝐓=Re(𝒦∗T)=Im(i𝒦∗T)=1|f′(z)|Im(Tf′′(z)f′(z))=κ(T).\begin{array}{r} \mathcal{K} \bullet\mathbf{T} = Re\left( \mathcal{K}^{*}T \right) = Im\left( i\mathcal{K}^{*}T \right) = \frac{1}{\left| f^{'}(z) \right|}Im\left( \frac{{Tf}^{''}(z)}{f^{'}(z)} \right) = \kappa(T). \end{array}
(1.3.207)

With a pre­cise math­e­mat­i­cal de­f­i­n­i­tion for com­plex cur­va­ture, we now take the ex­am­ple eze^{z}, for z=X+iθz = X + i\theta. As pre­vi­ous­ly proven, we know that if f(z)=ez,f(z) = e^{z},then f′(z)=ezf^{'}(z) = e^{z}, and cal­cu­lat­ing κ(T)\kappa(T) first, shows that

κ(T)=1|f′(z)|Im(Tf′′(z)f′(z))=1|(eX+iθ)′ |Im(eiθ(eX+iθ)′′(eX+iθ)′).\begin{array}{r} \kappa(T) = \frac{1}{\left| f^{'}(z) \right|}Im\left( \frac{{Tf}^{''}(z)}{f^{'}(z)} \right) = \frac{1}{\left| \left( e^{X + i\theta} \right)'\ \right|}Im\left( \frac{e^{i\theta}\left( e^{X + i\theta} \right)''}{\left( e^{X + i\theta} \right)^{'}} \right). \end{array}
(1.3.208)

Since f′(z)=(ez)′=ezf^{'}(z) = \left( e^{z} \right)^{'} = e^{z}, we know that (eX+iθ)′=(eX+iθ)\left( e^{X + i\theta} \right)^{'} = \left( e^{X + i\theta} \right) , and κ(T)\kappa(T) above, be­comes

κ(T)=1|eX+iθ |Im(eiθ∙eX+iθeX+iθ)=e−X∙Im(eiθ)=e−X(sinθ).\begin{array}{r} \kappa(T) = \frac{1}{\left| e^{X + i\theta}\ \right|}Im\left( \frac{e^{i\theta}{\bullet e}^{X + i\theta}}{e^{X + i\theta}} \right) = e^{- X} \bullet Im\left( e^{i\theta} \right) = e^{- X}(sin\theta). \end{array}
(1.3.209)

Eval­u­at­ing the com­plex cur­va­ture of eX+iθe^{X + i\theta}, we would find

𝒦=i(f′′)∗(f′)∗|f′|=i((eX+iθ)′′)∗((eX+iθ)′)∗|(eX+iθ)′|=i(eX−iθ)(eX−iθ)eX=ie−X,\begin{array}{r} \mathcal{K} =\frac{i\left( f^{''} \right)^{*}}{\left( f^{'} \right)^{*}\left| f^{'} \right|} = \frac{i\left( \left( e^{X + i\theta} \right)^{''} \right)^{*}}{\left( \left( e^{X + i\theta} \right)^{'} \right)^{*}\left| \left( e^{X + i\theta} \right)^{'} \right|} = \frac{i\left( e^{X - i\theta} \right)}{\left( e^{X - i\theta} \right)e^{X}} = ie^{- X}, \end{array}
(1.3.210)

and it is easy to show that 𝒦∙𝐓=κ(T)\mathcal{K} \bullet\mathbf{T} = \kappa(T)

𝒦∙𝐓=Im(i𝒦∗T)=Im(e−X∙eiθ)=e−X(sinθ).\begin{array}{r} \mathcal{K} \bullet\mathbf{T} = Im\left( i\mathcal{K}^{*}T \right) = Im\left( e^{- X} \bullet e^{i\theta} \right) = e^{- X}(sin\theta). \end{array}
(1.3.211)

The pre­ferred ap­proach to con­tem­plat­ing com­plex cur­va­ture starts by taking the com­plex func­tion in its polar form

f(z)=r(t)eiϕ(t).\begin{array}{r} f(z) = r(t)e^{i\phi(t)}. \end{array}
(1.3.212)

Where in­tu­itive­ly, it is ap­par­ent that the seg­ment length re­lates to the radial com­po­nent r(t),r(t),which is then ro­tat­ed by eiϕ(t)e^{i\phi(t)}, in re­la­tion to the real-axis of the com­plex plane. Since cur­va­ture is de­fined as the rate of change for a curve, com­pared to the change in the dis­tance at a point on that curve, the signed cur­va­ture of f(z)f(z) is

k(f(z))=ddt[ln⁡(eiϕ(t))]ddt[r(t)],\begin{array}{r} k\left( f(z) \right) = \frac{\frac{d}{dt}\left\lbrack \ln\left( e^{i\phi(t)} \right) \right\rbrack}{\frac{d}{dt}\left\lbrack r(t) \right\rbrack}, \end{array}
(1.3.213)

which sim­pli­fies to

k(f(z))=idϕ(t)dr(t).\begin{array}{r} k\left( f(z) \right) = \frac{id\phi(t)}{dr(t)}. \end{array}
(1.3.214)

In the next sec­tion, we apply cur­va­ture to func­tions in the com­plex plane by using ex­am­ples from the as­ymp­tot­ic number func­tions re­lat­ed to the D3𝕔D_{3\mathbb{c}} group in Chap­ter 1.

  1. Need­ham, Tris­tan, "Visual Com­plex Analy­sis", Oxford Uni­ver­si­ty Press, 1997