Masteries · Jason GlowneyArithmoí Book 1

Masteries

1.3.8 Geometric Algebra

The geo­met­ric prod­uct is fre­quent­ly used in physics, es­pe­cial­ly in the con­text of rel­a­tiv­i­ty. It is thus es­sen­tial for the reader to con­cep­tu­al­ize it co­her­ent­ly. It is de­fined for the prod­uct of two vec­tors u,vu,v, as the fol­low­ing

uv=u∙v+∧v,\begin{array}{r} uv = u \bullet v + \land v, \end{array}
(1.3.215)

where u∙vu \bullet v is the dot prod­uct of the vec­tors, rep­re­sent­ing the sym­met­ric por­tion, and u∧vu \land v is the wedge prod­uct, rep­re­sent­ing the an­ti­sym­met­ric por­tion. The geo­met­ric in­tu­ition that un­der­scores the geo­met­ric prod­uct is that the vec­tors, uu,vv are par­al­lel if their geo­met­ric prod­uct is equal to the dot prod­uct, while per­pen­dic­u­lar if it is equal to the wedge prod­uct. As we can see below, the wedge prod­uct pro­duces a bivec­tor, rep­re­sent­ing a par­al­lel­o­gram with area and di­rec­tion. In con­trast, the dot prod­uct is the prod­uct of the vector's mag­ni­tudes and the cosine of the angle be­tween them. We start by defin­ing our uu and vv vec­tors

u=(ab),  v=(cd),\begin{array}{r} u = \begin{pmatrix} a \\ b \end{pmatrix},\ \ v = \begin{pmatrix} c \\ d \end{pmatrix}, \end{array}
(1.3.216)

for which, the dot prod­uct of these two vec­tors is

u∙v=ac+bd.\begin{array}{r} u \bullet v = ac + bd. \end{array}
(1.3.217)

The wedge prod­uct makes use of unit basis vec­tors, seen by using the ex­am­ple of the two-di­men­sion­al real plane, where the basis vec­tors e1,e2e_{1},e_{2}, can be rep­re­sent­ed, as

e1=(10),  e2=(01).\begin{array}{r} e_{1} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix},\ \ e_{2} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}. \end{array}
(1.3.218)

We pro­ceed to con­sid­er the wedge prod­uct be­tween the vec­tors uu,vv, as fol­lows

u∧v=(e1a+e2b)∧(e1c+e2d)u \land v = \left( e_{1}a + e_{2}b \right) \land \left( e_{1}c + e_{2}d \right)
=ace1∧e1+ade1∧e2+bce2∧e1+bde2∧e2=(ad−bc)e1∧e2,\begin{array}{r} = ace_{1} \land e_{1} + ade_{1} \land e_{2} + bce_{2} \land e_{1} + bde_{2} \land e_{2} = (ad - bc)e_{1} \land e_{2}, \end{array}
(1.3.219)

where it is noted for the wedge prod­uct of unit basis vec­tors

e1∧e1=e2∧e2=0,\begin{array}{r} e_{1} \land e_{1} = e_{2} \land e_{2} = 0, \end{array}
(1.3.220)
e1∧e2=−e2∧e1.\begin{array}{r} e_{1} \land e_{2} = - e_{2} \land e_{1}. \end{array}
(1.3.221)
Figure
Figure 1.3.20 – The wedge prod­uct of two vec­tors uu and vv (u∧v).(u \land v).
Figure
Figure 1.3.21 – The dot prod­uct of two vec­tors uu and vv, (u∙v).(u \bullet v).

The in­tu­ition for these unit basis vector prod­ucts re­lates to the de­ter­mi­nant and the ori­en­tat­ed area of the par­al­lel­o­gram, which forms by the com­po­si­tion of the two vec­tors. The unit basis vec­tors form­ing wedge prod­ucts can be com­bined into a matrix from, and as­sessed, as fol­lows

e1∧e2=det(1001)=1,\begin{array}{r} e_{1} \land e_{2} = det\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} = 1, \end{array}
(1.3.222)
e2∧e1=det⁡(0110)=−1,\begin{array}{r} e_{2} \land e_{1} = \det\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} = - 1, \end{array}
(1.3.223)
e1∧e1=det⁡(1100)=0,\begin{array}{r} e_{1} \land e_{1} = \det\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} = 0, \end{array}
(1.3.224)
e2∧e2=det⁡(0011)=0.\begin{array}{r} e_{2} \land e_{2} = \det{\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix} = 0.} \end{array}
(1.3.225)

The var­i­ous dot prod­ucts be­tween the unit basis vec­tors then equal the fol­low­ing

e1∙e2=(1,0)(0,1)T=0,\begin{array}{r} e_{1} \bullet e_{2} = (1,0)(0,1)^{T} = 0, \end{array}
(1.3.226)
e2∙e1=(0,1)(1,0)T=0,\begin{array}{r} e_{2} \bullet e_{1} = (0,1)(1,0)^{T} = 0, \end{array}
(1.3.227)
e1∙e1=(1,0)(1,0)T=1,\begin{array}{r} e_{1} \bullet e_{1} = (1,0)(1,0)^{T} = 1, \end{array}
(1.3.228)
e2∙e2=(0,1)(0,1)T=1,\begin{array}{r} e_{2} \bullet e_{2} = (0,1)(0,1)^{T} = 1, \end{array}
(1.3.229)

which, in the con­text of their re­spec­tive wedge prod­ucts, the geo­met­ric prod­ucts of the par­al­lel unit basis vec­tors are unique­ly the result of the dot prod­uct

e1∙e1+e1∧e1=1+0,\begin{array}{r} e_{1} \bullet e_{1} + e_{1} \land e_{1} = 1 + 0, \end{array}
(1.3.230)
e2∙e2+e2∧e2=1+0.\begin{array}{r} e_{2} \bullet e_{2} + e_{2} \land e_{2} = 1 + 0. \end{array}
(1.3.231)

In turn, the per­pen­dic­u­lar unit basis vec­tors are solely the result of the wedge prod­uct por­tion of the geo­met­ric prod­uct

e1∙e2+e1∧e2=0+1,\begin{array}{r} e_{1} \bullet e_{2} + e_{1} \land e_{2} = 0 + 1, \end{array}
(1.3.232)
e2∙e1+e2∧e1=0−1.\begin{array}{r} e_{2} \bullet e_{1} + e_{2} \land e_{1} = 0 - 1. \end{array}
(1.3.233)

mind­ful that the wedge prod­uct re­sults are bivec­tors. The no­ta­tion II is com­mon­ly used to denote the fol­low­ing wedge prod­ucts

I=e1∧e2,\begin{array}{r} I = e_{1} \land e_{2}, \end{array}
(1.3.234)
−I=e2∧e1,\begin{array}{r} - I = e_{2} \land e_{1}, \end{array}
(1.3.235)

which is iso­mor­phic with the imag­i­nary number ii in the com­plex plane. This iso­mor­phism is ap­pre­ci­at­ed by squar­ing the bivec­tor

I2=(e1∧e2)(e1∧e2)=e1e2e1e2I^{2} = \left( e_{1} \land e_{2} \right)\left( e_{1} \land e_{2} \right) = e_{1}e_{2}e_{1}e_{2}
=−e2e1e1e2=−e2e2=−1,\begin{array}{r} = - e_{2}e_{1}e_{1}e_{2} = - e_{2}e_{2} = - 1, \end{array}
(1.3.236)

where we use the fact that, the wedge prod­uct of the two basis vec­tors equals their geo­met­ric prod­uct

e1∧e2=e1e2,\begin{array}{r} e_{1} \land e_{2} = e_{1}e_{2}, \end{array}
(1.3.237)

since they are per­pen­dic­u­lar, are there­fore, have a dot prod­uct equal to zero. So, the geo­met­ric prod­uct of two basis vec­tors can have four dif­fer­ent com­po­nents: a scalar, two vec­tors e1,e2e_{1},e_{2}, and a bivec­tor e1∧e2.e_{1} \land e_{2}.We start with an ex­am­ple using the geo­met­ric prod­uct to project a vector vv

v=(e1(eIt2),e2(e−It2)),\begin{array}{r} v = \left( e_{1}\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right),e_{2}\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right) \right), \end{array}
(1.3.238)

com­prised of ex­po­nen­tial func­tion com­po­nents ori­ent­ed in each basis, and then define the simple basis vector uu

u=(e1,e2).\begin{array}{r} u = \left( e_{1},e_{2} \right). \end{array}
(1.3.239)

Next, we take the geo­met­ric prod­uct of the two vec­tors, as uvuv, being com­prised of the sums of the dot and wedge prod­ucts

uv=u∙v+u∧v,\begin{array}{r} uv = u \bullet v + u \land v, \end{array}
(1.3.240)

find­ing the dot prod­uct equals

u∙v=(e1,e2)∙(e1(eIt2),e2(e−It2))u \bullet v = \left( e_{1},e_{2} \right) \bullet \left( e_{1}\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right),e_{2}\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right) \right)
=e1∙e1(eIt2)+e2∙e2(e−It2)=eIt+e−It2.\begin{array}{r} = e_{1} \bullet e_{1}\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right) + e_{2} \bullet e_{2}\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right) = \frac{e^{It} + e^{- It}}{2}. \end{array}
(1.3.241)

This ex­pres­sion should look fa­mil­iar, given that it is iso­mor­phic with the com­plex-valued iden­ti­ty for the cosine func­tion, seen by ex­pand­ing and sim­pli­fy­ing

eIt+e−It2=12(cos⁡(t)+Isin(t)+cos⁡(t)−Isin(t))=cos⁡(t),\begin{array}{r} \frac{e^{It} + e^{- It}}{2} = \frac{1}{2}\left( \cos(t) + Isin(t) + \cos(t) - Isin(t) \right) = \cos(t), \end{array}
(1.3.242)

and this is the ex­pect­ed result for u∙vu \bullet v. We pro­ceed, by eval­u­at­ing the wedge prod­uct,

u∧v=(e1+e2)∧(e1(eIt2)+e2(e−It2))u \land v = \left( e_{1} + e_{2} \right) \land \left( e_{1}\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right) + e_{2}\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right) \right)
=e1∧e1(eIt2)+e1∧e2(e−It2)+e2∧e1(eIt2)+e2∧e2(e−It2)= e_{1} \land e_{1}\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right) + e_{1} \land e_{2}\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right) + e_{2} \land e_{1}\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right) + e_{2} \land e_{2}\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right)
=e1∧e2(e−It2)+e2∧e1(eIt2)=I(e−It2)−I(eIt2)=eIt−e−It2I,\begin{array}{r} = e_{1} \land e_{2}\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right) + e_{2} \land e_{1}\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right) = I\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right) - I\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right) = \frac{e^{It} - e^{- It}}{2I}, \end{array}
(1.3.243)

which is an iso­mor­phic com­plex-valued iden­ti­ty for the sine func­tion. We expand this, and sim­pli­fy

u∧v=I(cos⁡(t)−Isin(t))2−I(cos⁡(t)+Isin(t))2u \land v = \frac{I\left( \cos(t) - Isin(t) \right)}{2} - \frac{I\left( \cos(t) + Isin(t) \right)}{2}
=Icos(t)+sin(t)2−(Icos(t)−sin(t))2=sin⁡(t),\begin{array}{r} = \frac{{Icos}(t) + sin(t)}{2} - \frac{\left( {Icos}(t) - sin(t) \right)}{2} = \sin(t), \end{array}
(1.3.244)

then add the dot and wedge prod­ucts to­geth­er, ar­riv­ing at the result for the geo­met­ric prod­uct uvuv

uv=cos⁡(t)+sin⁡(t).\begin{array}{r} uv = \cos(t) + \sin(t). \end{array}
(1.3.245)

In this ex­am­ple, we chose to not dis­trib­ute the bivec­tor II into the cosine and sine func­tions in the ex­po­nen­tial, where for in­stance, when dis­trib­ut­ing II, the prod­uct e1(eIt2)e_{1}\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right) would equal

e1(eIt2)=e1(cos⁡(t)2+e1∧e2sin⁡(t)2)=e1cos⁡(t)2+e2sin⁡(t)2.\begin{array}{r} e_{1}\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right) = e_{1}\left( \frac{\cos(t)}{2} + e_{1} \land e_{2}\frac{\sin(t)}{2} \right) = \frac{e_{1}\cos(t)}{2} + \frac{e_{2}\sin(t)}{2}. \end{array}
(1.3.246)

If we did so, the e2sin⁡(t)e_{2}\sin(t) vector por­tion would then be placed into the e2e_{2} basis po­si­tion. In these cases, care must be taken given that the unit bases an­ti­com­mute with wedge prod­ucts. To demon­strate that dis­trib­ut­ing the bases for the vector vv at the onset is viable, we dis­trib­ute the e2e_{2} basis into the ex­po­nen­tial for the other e2(e−It2)e_{2}\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right) vector com­po­nent

e2(e−It2)=e2(cos⁡(t)2+e2∧e1sin⁡(t)2)=e2cos⁡(t)2+e1sin⁡(t)2,\begin{array}{r} e_{2}\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right) = e_{2}\left( \frac{\cos(t)}{2} + e_{2} \land e_{1}\frac{\sin(t)}{2} \right) = \frac{e_{2}\cos(t)}{2} + \frac{e_{1}\sin(t)}{2}, \end{array}
(1.3.247)

then ex­press v′v^{'}, as the com­po­nents or­dered by basis

v′=(e12(cos⁡(t)+sin⁡(t))e22(cos⁡(t)+sin⁡(t))).\begin{array}{r} v^{'} = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{e_{1}}{2}\left( \cos(t) + \sin(t) \right) \\ \frac{e_{2}}{2}\left( \cos(t) + \sin(t) \right) \end{pmatrix}. \end{array}
(1.3.248)

Now, we eval­u­ate the prod­uct uv′uv^{'}

uv′=u∙v′+u∧v′,\begin{array}{r} uv^{'} = u \bullet v^{'} + u \land v^{'}, \end{array}
(1.3.249)

start­ing with the dot prod­uct por­tion

(e1,e2) ∙v′=cos⁡(t)+sin⁡(t),\begin{array}{r} \left( e_{1},e_{2} \right)\ \bullet v^{'} = \cos(t) + \sin(t), \end{array}
(1.3.250)

whose result is due to the scalar por­tion (cos⁡(t)+sin⁡(t))\left( \cos(t) + \sin(t) \right) being the same for both bases, and then the wedge prod­uct will equal zero

(e1+e2)∧(e12+e22)=e1∧e1+e1∧e2+e2∧e1+e2∧e22=0.\begin{array}{r} \left( e_{1} + e_{2} \right) \land \left( \frac{e_{1}}{2} + \frac{e_{2}}{2} \right) = \frac{e_{1} \land e_{1} + e_{1} \land e_{2} + e_{2} \land e_{1} + e_{2} \land e_{2}}{2} = 0. \end{array}
(1.3.251)

In Figure 1.3.22, the vec­tors uu,vv are par­al­lel in ori­en­ta­tion and there­fore, have a geo­met­ric prod­uct de­fined solely by their dot prod­uct.

Figure
Figure 1.3.22 –Par­al­lel vec­tors uu and vv with geo­met­ric prod­uct uv=u∙v.uv = u \bullet v.

In gen­er­al, the geo­met­ric prod­uct should not be as­sumed to be com­mu­ta­tive, given that the order of the prod­uct can result in a ro­ta­tion in the op­po­site di­rec­tion. To demon­strate, we switch the geo­met­ric prod­uct order from the pre­vi­ous ex­am­ple

vu=v∙u+v∧u,\begin{array}{r} vu = v \bullet u + v \land u, \end{array}
(1.3.252)

then pro­ceed to find the dot and wedge prod­uct por­tions, as fol­lows

v∙u=(e1(eIt2),e2(e−It2))∙(e1,e2)=eIt2+e−It2,v \bullet u = \left( e_{1}\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right),e_{2}\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right) \right) \bullet \left( e_{1},e_{2} \right) = \frac{e^{It}}{2} + \frac{e^{- It}}{2},
v∧u=(e1(eIt2)+e2(e−It2))∧(e1,e2)=e1∧e2(eIt2)+e2∧e1(e−It2).\begin{array}{r} v \land u = \left( e_{1}\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right) + e_{2}\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right) \right) \land \left( e_{1},e_{2} \right) = e_{1} \land e_{2}\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right) + e_{2} \land e_{1}\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right). \end{array}
(1.3.253)

The dot prod­uct is sym­met­ric and, as ex­pect­ed, re­mains the same, while the an­ti­sym­met­ric wedge prod­uct has changed in sign when com­pared to the wedge prod­uct from u∧vu \land v,

u∧v=e1∧e2(e−It2)+e2∧e1(eIt2).\begin{array}{r} u \land v = e_{1} \land e_{2}\left( \frac{e^{- It}}{2} \right) + e_{2} \land e_{1}\left( \frac{e^{It}}{2} \right). \end{array}
(1.3.254)

So, it be­comes clear that, u∧v=−v∧u.u \land v = - v \land u.The result of the re­versed-order geo­met­ric prod­uct is

vu=cos⁡(t)−sin⁡(t),\begin{array}{r} vu = \cos(t) - \sin(t), \end{array}
(1.3.255)

where the change in the sign for the sin⁡(t)\sin(t) value in­di­cates a shift in the di­rec­tion of ro­ta­tion. Geo­met­ric al­ge­bra will be an es­sen­tial tool when we start con­sid­er­ing flat cur­va­ture and the func­tions that gen­er­ate the as­ymp­tot­ic bound­aries of the unit hy­per­bo­la.